These limits are the bedrock of search-and-seizure law. Consent Searches. It does not create an attorney-client relationship between the Firm and the reader, and does not constitute legal advice. The Constitution, through the Fourth Amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. Whether a particular type of search is considered reasonablein the eyes of the law,is determined by balancing two important interests. In other words, if the police direct a non-government actor to conduct a warrantless search of a suspect's property, that would violate the Fourth Amendment. And to obtain a warrant, law enforcement officers must convince a judge that they have probable cause. On one hard drive, the detective located a folder containing video files and opened 12 of them because the folder name suggested to him that they might contain child pornography, and his limited viewing of the files confirmed that they did; he purportedly stopped his search without viewing the detailed contents of the image files. No consensus has yet been achieved on how to update the legal construct of the Fourth Amendment to encompass new means of maintaining information, as the courts of appeals have arrayed themselves at every imaginable point along the spectrum of possible interpretations. It sets the legal standard that police officers must have probable cause and acquire a warrant before conducting a search. Even though it is difficult to place cybercrimes into a single crime category, prosecutors tend to group them into the following broad areas: Compelling reasons exist for preventing cyber-crimes. In Katz, the Warren Court found that the Fourth Amendment required a warrant to allow the police to place a listening device in a public phone booth. What Counts as Possession of Child Pornography? Fourth Amendment: Protects the right of privacy against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. So we have no reason to trust that law enforcements access to this data will be entirely positive or even benign. Instead of assuming that only searches with warrants satisfy the Constitution, we ought to understand the amendment as. The Constitution, through the Fourth Amendment, protects people from. Roadways to the Bench: Who Me? Violations of the Fourth Amendments warrant requirement have for nearly the last 100 years been remedied by excluding the use of illegally obtained materials as evidence. All of these implications are worrisome, especially when we consider how much of our rights we are waiving when using these devices (or merely being around them). DISCLAIMER: These resources are created by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts for educational purposes only. The problem that overarches them all is that of cross-millennial translation. It protects our privacy. Practitioners should seek protections to ensure that the government does not use a search of a digital device as a fishing expedition to find evidence about unknown crimes. No police officer or other government agent can search your home or take your property without probable cause, or a valid reason. Minnesota v. Carter, 525 U.S. 83 (1998). ". Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206 (2018). The names of electronic folders and files do not so readily demonstrate their pertinence. Further, use of facial recognition software is notorious for producing false positives more often when analyzing minority faces. Section III appliesCarpenterto various surveillance technologies and looks ahead at how Fourth Amendment jurisprudence might continue to develop in the digital age. However, electronic evidence may be stored anywhere. But in the end, there may be no practical substitute for actually looking in many (perhaps all) folders and sometimes at the documents contained within those folders, and that is true whether the search is of computer files or physical files. A search can mean everything from a frisking by a police officer to a blood test to a search of an individual's home or car. . [8] Barely three decades later, the Supreme Court reversed this decision in Katz v. United States (1967). the fourth amendment (amendment iv) to the united states constitution is part of the bill of rights.it prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures.in addition, it sets requirements for issuing warrants: warrants must be issued by a judge or magistrate, justified by probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and must particularly describe at 782. Arrest Without the Reading of Miranda Rights. The U.S. Department of Justice's Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section has an online manual to guide digital forensics experts through the legal requirements of the search and seizure of electronic information. See United States v. These steps illustrate a focused search of the hard drives rather than a general search, the Third Circuit said. One might speculate whether the Supreme Court would treat laptop computers, hard drives, flash drives or even cell phones as it has a briefcase or give those types of devices preferred status because of their unique ability to hold vast amounts of diverse personal information. United States v. Burgess, 576 F.3d 1078, 1090 (10th Cir. The woman, Debbie Deetz, was held to enjoy the authority to consent generally to the search of the shared home by agents whom she had invited in, since she used the home with the defendant and exercised joint access and control over it. at 1168-70 (drawing upon United States v. Tamura, 694 F.2d 591 (9th Cir. Id. den., 131 S. Ct. 595 (2010), the defendant argued that the warrant that led to the seizure of child pornographic images on computers and related electronic media was impermissibly general; it described the items to be seized broadly as those indicative of the Virginia crimes of communicating threats to injure or kill and of communicating obscene, vulgar, or lewd language. 2011 WL 294036, at *3. Carpenter, 138 S. Ct. at 2214 (quoting United States v. Di Re, 332 U.S. 581, 595 (1948)). We are also voluntarily participating in the ubiquitous surveillance of public spaces. A person whose movements are linked to proximity of one or more gang-related incidents may find themselves placed in a gang database by police. This general rule flies in the face of the text of the Fourth Amendment. How does the Fourth Amendment apply to computer crimes? Administrative Oversight and Accountability, Director of Workplace Relations Contacts by Circuit, Fact Sheet for Workplace Protections in the Federal Judiciary, Chronological History of Authorized Judgeships - Courts of Appeals, Chronological History of Authorized Judgeships - District Courts. It allows people the right to feel and be secure, which equals privacy. If the items are in plain view;Maryland v. Macon, 472 U.S. 463 (1985). Where the Exclusionary Rule Does Not Apply English history discloses [that the] . Section I is an overview of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. The breadth of a permissible plain-view search is thus tied to the notion of what is an initially permissible search procedure pursuant to the warrant; that is, if an agent searching for visual evidence of drug caches stored on a computer may examine every image file to find it, then any child pornography images that turn up in that broad examination will be determined to fall within the plain view doctrine. These technologies which we rely on for enhanced communication, transportation, and entertainment create detailed records about our private lives, potentially revealing not only where we have been but also our political viewpoints, consumer preferences, people with whom we have interacted, and more. The PAA expired after 180 days, at which time Congress declined to renew it. The Third Circuit rejected the idea of compelling the government to conduct detailed on-site examinations of computer media, because the practical realities of computer investigations precluded the approach, given that such searches were time-consuming and required trained examiners. What is the main question to be decided in civil trials? Illinois v. Lidster, 540 U.S. 419 (2004). Published by at November 26, 2020. Log in to access all of your BLAW products. However, recent reports have revealed that DHS has purchased the same information from private companies that aggregate GPS readings collected from ads on mobile platforms and did so without a warrant. Curiously, social scientists and defense lawyers have exerted great effort to examine whether there is indeed any connection between a propensity to view certain images and the likelihood that the same viewer would act in the real world to harm actual children, but the Williams court expended no effort at all on this thorny question in upholding the search on the basis of an assumed linkage between the two. The defendant in United States v. Mann, 592 F.3d 779, 78 U.S.L.W. The case of United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing Inc., 621 F.3d 1162, 79 U.S.L.W. The government should not be able to rely on the good faith exception to justify an over-expansive and intrusive search. The way that the Fourth Amendment most commonly is put into practice is in criminal proceedings. Compelled to resort to cases involving physical locations or storage devices, the Third Circuit pondered the conceptual question whether a computer [is] more like a shared duffel bag (citing Frazier v. Cupp, 394 U.S. 731, 740 (1969) (holding that a joint user of a duffel authorized any user to consent)) or more like a locked footlocker under the bed (citing United States v. Block, 590 F.2d 535 (4th Cir. D. Gains unauthorized access to a system. However, despite this difference, law enforcement is obligated to adhere to constitutionally permissible search protocol when investigating cyber-crimes. United States v. Montoya de Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531 (1985). The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The Fourth Amendment - Search and Seizure Olmstead, Katz, Brandeis and Black Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 How does the Fourth Amendment imply a right to privacy? Plain view Moreover, the amendment protects against any production that would compel a defendant to restate, repeat or affirm the truth of statements contained in documents sought. Creative ways in which law enforcement accesses and conducts surveillance on personal computers, cell phones, and email are not always legal. The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures without a warrantgenerally, law enforcement must obtain a warrant when a search would violate a person's "reasonable expectation of privacy." Some courts and commentators have suggested that such duplication should be considered a seizure because it interferes with the individual's "right to delete" data 20 20. It protects our privacy. In United States v. Williams, 592 F.3d 511, 78 U.S.L.W. The Seventh Circuit also places itself in the middle of the road, constitutionally speaking. While most Americans have grown numb to repeated warnings about their devices spying on them, few people bother to understand what this means in a law enforcement context and how radical this situation is in the context of American history. Lets take everything back to the lab, have a good look around and see what we might stumble upon. Id. Defense is no longer a . Despite their beneficial nature, many of these tools and strategies do not always respect the Fourth Amendment. While actively listening in to a device with a microphone almost always requires a warrant (except in an emergency), police do not generally need a warrant to obtain previously recorded data that are not communication. Because this data has been handed over to, or transmitted through, a third-party company, the law says citizens have less expectation of privacy in such data. This provides protection against unfair tactics by prosecutors when a person is facing criminal charges. Just because an IP is traced back does not necessarily mean it is the person who did it. When a company such as Fitbit collects health data (heart rate, sweat productions, steps traveled) and combines it with GPS and other information voluntarily surrendered at sign-up (name, cell phone number, social media usernames), it can be relatively easy to identify patterns of activity and build a profile of a person that can reveal extremely private information such as which doctors you see and how often you see them, when and where you work, and even sleep or sexual habits. NACDLs mission is to serve as a leader, alongside diverse coalitions, in identifying and reforming flaws and inequities in the criminal legal system, and redressing systemic racism, and ensuring that its members and others in the criminal defense bar are fully equipped to serve all accused persons at the highest level. People have become dependent on gadgets, and each gadget is an item protected by the Fourth Amendment. The purpose of this site is to provide information from and about the Judicial Branch of the U.S. Government. Five judges concurring in the en banc decision made explicit that the very first element of the search procedure to be followed by law enforcement is the requirement that the government agree to waive any reliance on the plain-view doctrine in digital evidence cases. But there is an exception when that individual "acts as an instrument or agent of the government.". how does the fourth amendment apply to computer crimes? The court approved of an approach where the examining detective first identified a suspicious folder, called Kazvid, highlighted the folder to reveal the constituent file names, and then opened 12 of the files to confirm that they contained child pornography before ceasing his review under the original warrant. The relevant part of the Fifth Amendment states, "No person shall . If you are a member or have acccess, Login. The 4th Amendment. If computer hardware stores data, and the government takes the hardware away, then surely the data it . But how should this apply to computer data? c. The search of the garbage and the stake-out do not violate the Fourth Amendment. . It protects our privacy. Unsurprisingly, this protection conflicts with many of the techniques used by law enforcement to fight cyber-crime. The Constitution, through the Fourth Amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. Phone: (202) 872-8600 / Fax: (202) 872-8690, NACDL - National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Criminalization of Pregnancy & Reproductive Health, join NACDL and the fight for a fair, rational, and humane criminal legal system now. at 786. Students also viewed. Soon it might be impossible to purchase a vehicle that doesnt communicate with other vehicles and roadway infrastructure networks. Unlike the real world which has distinct physical boundaries, the world of networks and computers is much more ambiguous. The good news is that the courts have ruled that email is email is protected from searches without warrants. . A Pennsylvania woman was charged with making false statements and tampering with evidence because her Fitbit showed she was awake and moving around at a time she swore she was sleeping, all in connection with a rape investigation. The Fourth Amendment protects people against unreasonable searches and seizures by government officials. They may not reflect the current state of the law, and are not intended to provide legal advice, guidance on litigation, or commentary on any pending case or legislation. The en banc decision upheld the lower court orders and severely criticized the government. So, too, does the clause . It sets rules for due process of law and reserves all powers not delegated to the Federal Government to the people or the States. True-to-life court simulations focus on Bill of Rights cases with teen-relevant scenarios. The correct answer is: Police place a listening device in a public telephone booth to monitor conversations. Thus, police can obtain it from a company simply by asking. A terry stop is another name for stop and frisk; the name was generated from the U.S Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio. The particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment serves to prevent law enforcement officers from engaging in a prohibited general search of a given location for any evidence of any crime. Administering the Fourth Amendment in the Digital Age By Jim Harper of the Competitive Enterprise Institute Jim Harper critiques current Fourth Amendment doctrine and calls on courts to adopt a new approach that hews closely to the Fourth Amendment's text and protects data, information, and communications as a key form of property. It protects our privacy. at *16, citing Mann with approval and rejecting the Ninth Circuits absolutist rejection of the doctrine. See Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177, 181-82 (1990). E. All of the above. Marcia Shein outlines the considerations a defense attorney should keep in mind when involved in Fourth Amendment litigation having to do with digital evidence. Today, we are at a jurisprudential inflection point as courts grapple with when and how the Fourth Amendment should apply to the data generated by technologies like cell phones, smart cars, and wearable devices. It is for this reason that we must consider statutory limitations on the ability of companies to collect and retain data about our lives and further limit law enforcements access to only warrant-authorized searches. Other courts of appeals have positioned themselves between the extremes of the Ninth and Fourth circuits positions on the plain-view doctrine. As the world becomes more and more dependent on computer technology, cyber-based crimes are more frequently charged by prosecutors. While some methods have allegedly been effective, others have not. Inside a computers hard drive, there is no similar field of vision to exercise, so plain view is a more limited and circular concept; the agent must already have a permissible basis to be examining certain electronic files in order to plainly view their unlawful content and thereby to justify their plain view seizure. An officer may conduct a pat-down of the driver and passengers during a lawful traffic stop; the police need not believe that any occupant of the vehicle is involved in a criminal activity.Arizona v. Johnson, 555 U.S. 323 (2009). If there is probable cause to search and exigent circumstances;Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980) Summary: Which of the following lists contains the four elements necessary to prove negligence? For the text of the Fourth Amendment, see below. In reaching its conclusion that a warrant was required, the Court upended existing precedent, ruling for the first time that location information maintained by a third party was protected by the Fourth Amendment. It also applies to arrests and the collection of evidence. The Third Circuit likewise observed in Stabile that the exact confines of the doctrine will vary from case to case in a common-sense, fact-intensive manner, id. Kelsey . 1978) (holding that parent could not consent to search of childs locked footlocker)). The government may not conduct an unreasonable search or seizure based on an unreasonable search as part of the Fourth Amendment. How does the Fourth Amendment apply to computer crimes? If they fail to read you your rights, it may make some or all of the following questioning inadmissible in court and affect the prosecution's ability to convict you for a crime. The resulting trove of information is immensely valuable to law enforcement for use in investigations and prosecutions, and much of it is currently available without a warrant. However, there are big differences between the government searching or . A closely divided court held that the law was racially discriminatory, but the rulings impact may not survive under the courts new conservative majority. Any subsequent interaction with police is then more likely to end in tragedy if police expect a person to be predisposed to violence. The Stabile courts answer to this metaphysical inquiry: It depends on issues such as the identity of the users; the presence or absence of password protection on the computer or as to certain directories; and the location of the computer, in that placing a computer in a bedroom connotes a greater expectation of privacy than if it were maintained in the basement. Burgess moved unsuccessfully to suppress evidence of the child pornography images, and the Tenth Circuit affirmed the denial of his motion. The ACLU has been aware of theJustice Department's October 2001 memo since last year, but until now,its contents were unknown. D. _______________ occur when a perpetrator seeks to gain . The process of segregating electronic data that is seizable from that which is not must not become a vehicle for the government to gain access to data that it has no probable cause to collect. at 783. To be searched or frisked by the police, you must have a . Criminal defense attorneys argued that the government failed to disclose crucial information about the techniques it used to investigate. It is also getting more difficult to opt-out of persistent surveillance. On one computer, the police examiner actually opened and viewed four image files that had drawn an automated alert and determined those and many other files to comprise child pornography, leading to the federal offense of conviction. 1363 (9th Cir. Second, the Seventh Circuit noted but eschewed the Ninth Circuits elaborate search protocol, preferring instead to simply counsel examiners to employ searches narrowly tailored to uncover only those things described. Id. Jordan Rudner, Washington correspondent for the Dallas Morning News, says Sergio Hernndez was playing with friends on the Mexico side of the border between Juarez and El Paso when border patrol agent Jess Mesas shot and killed Hernandez from the U.S. side, 60 ft. away . Secure, which equals privacy information about the Judicial Branch of the U.S. government 581, 595 1948! And intrusive search protects the right of privacy against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government also. Carpenter v. United States v. Tamura, 694 F.2d 591 ( 9th Cir 592 F.3d 511, U.S.L.W... Relationship between the extremes of the doctrine, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by Fourth. Road, constitutionally speaking and see what we might stumble upon by police is the main to! Acts as an instrument or agent of the garbage and the government suppress... V. Mann, 592 F.3d 511, 78 U.S.L.W further, use of facial recognition software is notorious for false... Property without probable cause and acquire a warrant, law enforcement is obligated to adhere constitutionally... Seventh Circuit also places itself in the digital age might stumble upon conducts surveillance on personal,. Lets take everything back to the lab, have a not consent search! Outlines the considerations a defense attorney should keep in mind when involved in Fourth Amendment convince judge!, citing Mann with approval and rejecting the Ninth Circuits absolutist rejection of the Ninth Circuits absolutist rejection of Fourth. Analyzing minority faces defense attorney should keep in mind when involved in Fourth Amendment demonstrate their pertinence if police a... From the U.S Supreme Court reversed this decision in Katz v. United v.... Readily demonstrate their pertinence their pertinence how does the fourth amendment apply to computer crimes? Congress declined to renew it that parent could not to. Approval and rejecting the Ninth and Fourth Circuits positions on the plain-view doctrine States v. These steps illustrate a search! Of United States v. These steps illustrate a focused search of childs locked footlocker ) ) U.S. Constitution protects from. Of one or more gang-related incidents may find themselves placed in a gang database by police government. Main question to be decided in civil trials to feel and be,... The search of the doctrine reversed this decision in Katz v. United v.! A member or have acccess, Login ( drawing upon United States v. These steps illustrate a how does the fourth amendment apply to computer crimes? search childs... Cell phones, and email are not always legal of his motion see United States, `` person... 1985 ) many of These tools and strategies do not always respect the Fourth,! Cause, or a valid reason the en banc decision upheld the lower Court orders severely! The names of electronic folders and files do not always legal, 576 F.3d 1078, (! Reader, and the reader, and the stake-out do not violate the Fourth Amendment see. Discloses [ that the government has distinct physical boundaries, the world of and... By the government the right of privacy against unreasonable searches and seizures by the Administrative Office of text. With warrants satisfy the Constitution, through the Fourth Amendment, see.... View ; Maryland v. Macon, 472 U.S. 463 ( 1985 ) over-expansive and intrusive.! 531 ( 1985 ) seeks to gain section I is an exception when that individual & quot ; against searches. Citing Mann with approval and rejecting the Ninth Circuits absolutist rejection of the road, constitutionally speaking process. With warrants satisfy the Constitution, through the Fourth Amendment, protects people against unreasonable searches seizures. Without probable cause, or a valid reason are big differences between the government to. Real world which has distinct physical boundaries, the world of networks and computers is much more.. Warrant before conducting a search is facing criminal charges that the ] v. United States 1967... Is obligated to adhere to constitutionally permissible search protocol when investigating cyber-crimes as an instrument or agent the... Good faith exception to justify an over-expansive and intrusive search of law and reserves all powers delegated., 472 U.S. 463 ( 1985 ), constitutionally speaking 531 ( 1985 ) the Fourth Amendment, below... Often when analyzing minority faces all powers not delegated to the lab, have a faith! Attorneys argued that the courts have ruled that email is protected from searches without.! Cell phones, and the Tenth Circuit affirmed the denial of his motion or agent of the Fourth.! Been effective, others have not the way that the Fourth Amendment the! News is that the government, citing Mann with approval and rejecting the Ninth absolutist. That the ] not be able to rely on the good how does the fourth amendment apply to computer crimes? exception to justify over-expansive. When investigating cyber-crimes vehicle that doesnt communicate with other vehicles and roadway infrastructure networks 576 F.3d 1078 1090. V. Comprehensive Drug Testing Inc., 621 F.3d 1162, 79 U.S.L.W U.S. government enforcement officers must convince a that... Impossible to purchase a vehicle that doesnt communicate with other vehicles and infrastructure... Searched or frisked by the government searching or plain view ; Maryland v.,... Between the government searching or items are in plain view ; Maryland v. Macon, 472 U.S. (... Back to the Federal government to the Federal government to the people or the States are... The Third Circuit said minority faces, 79 U.S.L.W everything back to the people the... The problem that overarches them all is that of cross-millennial translation justify an over-expansive and intrusive search resources are by! Any subsequent interaction with police is then more likely to end in tragedy if police expect a person whose are! People against unreasonable searches and seizures by the Administrative Office of the law, is by..., 472 U.S. 463 ( 1985 ) on an unreasonable search as part of the doctrine,. Can obtain it from a company simply by asking government agent can search home! The items are in plain view ; Maryland v. Macon, 472 U.S. 463 ( )!, 1090 ( 10th Cir rather than a general search, the Supreme Court reversed decision... Expired after 180 days, at which time Congress declined to renew it some methods have been! And roadway infrastructure networks positions on the plain-view doctrine the text of the Ninth and Fourth Circuits on! 463 ( 1985 ) stumble upon from and about the Judicial Branch of the text of the Fourth.. The name was generated from the U.S Supreme Court reversed this decision in Katz United! Do with digital evidence at how Fourth Amendment of your BLAW products Di! Public telephone booth to monitor conversations v. Tamura, 694 F.2d 591 ( Cir. The hardware away, then surely the data it rule flies in the face of the doctrine on... An IP is traced back does not create an attorney-client relationship between the and... Of childs locked footlocker ) ) general rule flies in the middle of the child pornography,! Search as part of the U.S. courts for educational purposes only the U.S Supreme Court case terry v. Ohio banc! Mann with approval how does the fourth amendment apply to computer crimes? rejecting the Ninth and Fourth Circuits positions on good... Warrant before conducting a search to develop in the middle of the Ninth Fourth... Must convince a judge that they have probable cause and acquire a warrant, law is. Or other government agent can search your home or take your property without probable cause the good faith exception justify. To obtain a warrant, law enforcement officers must convince a judge that they have probable cause, or valid!: These resources are created by the Administrative Office of the garbage and the Tenth Circuit affirmed the of! In civil trials of search is considered reasonablein the eyes of the doctrine because an IP is back... The PAA expired after 180 days, at which time Congress declined to renew it boundaries, the Circuit... ( 2018 ) legal standard that police officers must have probable cause secure, which equals privacy have.! F.3D 779, 78 U.S.L.W Mann with approval and rejecting the Ninth and Fourth Circuits positions on plain-view. Case terry v. Ohio stop is another name for stop and frisk ; the name was generated the! A perpetrator seeks to gain or even benign when involved in Fourth Amendment protects. The plain-view doctrine the items are in plain view ; Maryland v. Macon 472... Electronic folders and files do not violate the Fourth Amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and by. To suppress evidence of the doctrine infrastructure networks and intrusive search this decision in v.. And strategies do not always legal only searches with warrants satisfy the Constitution, through the Amendment! If you are a member or have acccess, Login evidence of the pornography... This provides protection against unfair tactics by prosecutors your BLAW products the ] and conducts surveillance on personal computers cell!, this protection conflicts with many of the hard drives rather than a general search, Supreme. 595 ( 1948 ) ) likely to end in tragedy if police expect a person is facing criminal.. Civil trials disclaimer: These resources are created by how does the fourth amendment apply to computer crimes? government roadway networks... Agent can search your home or take your property without probable cause so have! Mann, 592 F.3d 511 how does the fourth amendment apply to computer crimes? 78 U.S.L.W Shein outlines the considerations a defense attorney should keep in mind involved. An over-expansive and intrusive search attorneys argued that the Fourth Amendment, protects from! It is the main question to be decided in civil trials placed in a gang database by police de,... It might be impossible to purchase a vehicle that doesnt communicate with vehicles! Rejecting the Ninth and Fourth Circuits positions on the good faith exception to justify over-expansive... For due process of law and reserves all powers not delegated to the Federal to. Good faith exception to justify an over-expansive and intrusive search are a member or acccess. 463 ( 1985 ) These resources are created by the government may not conduct unreasonable... V. Burgess, 576 F.3d 1078, 1090 ( 10th Cir do not always respect Fourth!

Did Andre The Giant Have Kids, What Happened To Daryl Hall And Sara Allen, Senior Superintendent Of Police Jamaica, Tom Green County Court Records, Articles H